ENG-105 Peer Review Worksheet: Rhetorical Analysis of a Public Document

[ad_1]

ENG-105 Peer Review Worksheet: Rhetorical Analysis of a Public Document
Part of your responsibility as a student in this course is to provide quality feedback to your peers that will help them to improve their writing skills. This worksheet will assist you in providing that feedback. To highlight the text and type over the information in the boxes on this worksheet, double-click on the first word.
Name of the draft’s author: Type Author Name Here
Name of the peer reviewer: Type Reviewer Name Here
Reviewer
After reading through the draft one time, write a summary (3-5 sentences) of the paper that includes your assessment of how well the essay meets the assignment requirements as specified in the syllabus and the rubric.
Type 3-5 Sentence Summary Here

After a second, closer reading of the draft, answer each of the following questions. Positive answers will give you specific elements of the draft to praise; negative answers will indicate areas in need of improvement and revision. Please be sure to indicate at least three positive aspects of the draft and at least three areas for improvement in reply to the questions at the bottom of this worksheet.
Rhetorical Analysis Content and Ideas
• How effectively does the thesis statement identify the main points that the writer would like to make about the public document he or she is analyzing?
Type Answer Here
• How successful is the writer’s summary of the public document under study?
Type Answer Here
• How effective is the writer’s explanation and evaluation of the rhetorical situation, genre, and stance?
Type Answer Here
• How persuasively is evidence used to support assertions and enrich the essay?
Type Answer Here
• How effectively does the essay’s content support the thesis by analyzing the document and evaluating its effectiveness according to strategies from chapter 8 of Writing with Purpose?
Type Answer Here

Organization
• How effectively does the introduction engage the reader while providing an overview of the paper?
Type Answer Here
• Please identify the writer’s thesis and quote it in the box below.
Type Writer’s Thesis Here
• How effectively do the paragraphs develop the topic sentence and advance the essay’s ideas?
Type Answer Here
• How effectively does the conclusion provide a strong, satisfying ending, not a mere summary of the essay?
Type Answer Here

Format
• How closely does the paper follow GCU formatting style? Is it double-spaced in 12 pt. Times New Roman font? Does it have 1″ margins? Does it use headers (page numbers using appropriate header function)? Does it have a proper heading (with student’s name, date, course, and instructor’s name)?
0Yes 0No Add optional clarification here
• Are all information, quotations, and borrowed ideas cited in parenthetical GCU format?
0Yes 0No Add optional clarification here
• Are all sources listed on the references page in GCU format?
0Yes 0No Add optional clarification here
• Is the required minimum number of sources listed?
0Yes 0No Add optional clarification here
Language Use and Style
• Are the voice and tone of the essay effective in characterizing ideas and creating the appropriate mood? If “No,” please provide examples of ineffective or inappropriate voice and tone.
0Yes 0No Add optional clarification here
• How effectively does the paper incorporate a variety of sentence structures that strengthen the ideas, create vitality, and avoid choppiness in the writing?
0Yes 0No Add optional clarification here
• How would you assess the writer’s diction (i.e., word choice)? Does the writer use active verbs, concrete nouns, and precise words?
0Yes 0No Add optional clarification here

Grammar and Mechanics
• Does the writer use proper grammar, punctuation, and spelling? If “No,” please provide examples of errors in need of correction.
0Yes 0No Add optional clarification here
• Is the writing clear and comprehensible throughout the draft? If “No,” please provide examples in need of improvement.
0Yes 0No Add optional clarification here

Three things that I liked about your draft are:
1. Type First Thing You Liked
2. Type Second Thing You Liked
3. Type Third Thing You Liked

Three things that could be improved are:
1. Type 1st Area for Improvement
2. Type 2nd Area for Improvement
3. Type 3rd Area for Improvement

The post ENG-105 Peer Review Worksheet: Rhetorical Analysis of a Public Document appeared first on mynursinghomeworks.

[ad_2]

Source link