Gay Population Growth Essay Research Paper Theunprecedented

Gay Population Growth Essay, Research Paper

? The

unprecedented growing of the homosexual community in recent history has transformed our

civilization and consciousness, making radically new possibilities for people to

? come out? and live more openly as homophiles? ( Herdt 2 ) . Before the

1969? s Stonewall public violence in New York, homosexualism was a tabu topic. Research

refering homosexualism emphasized the etiology, intervention, and psychological

accommodation of homophiles. Timess have changed since 1969. Homosexuals have

gained great attending in humanistic disciplines, amusement, media, and political relations.

Yesterday? s research on homosexualism has expanded to include seeking to

understand the different experiences and state of affairss of homophiles ( Ben-Ari

89-90 ) . Despite the passage, small consideration has been given to

understanding the turning population of cheery striplings. 25 % of American

households are likely to hold a homosexual kid ( Hidalgo 24 ) ; In the United States,

three million striplings are estimated to be homosexual. Yet, American society

still ignores cheery striplings. Majority of kids are raised in heterosexual

households, taught in heterosexual constitutions, and set in heterosexual equal

groups. Gay striplings frequently feel forced by parents to go through as

? heterosexually normal? ( Herdt 2 ) . As a consequence, homosexual teens hide their

sexual orientation and feelings, particularly from their parents. Limited research

conducted on homosexual immature grownups on revelation to parents by and large suggests that

revelation is a clip of familial crisis and emotional hurt. Very few

research workers argue that revelation to parents consequences in felicity, conveying

parents and kids closer ( Ben-Ari 90 ) . The argument over homosexualism as

nature or raising dominates most subjects about homosexualism. Peoples frequently

confound the nature/nurture issue with the development of homosexual individuality. In fact,

the nature/nurture statement plays a little, undistinguished function refering homosexual

young persons ( Walling 11 ) . Homosexual individuality is the position of the ego as homosexual

in association with romantic and sexual state of affairss ( Troiden 46 ) Many research workers

have either discussed or created several theoretical accounts or theories refering the

development of homosexual individuality. However, the most outstanding is Troiden? s

sociological four-stage theoretical account of homosexual individuality formation. Dr. Richard R.

Troiden describes the development of homosexual individuality in four phases:

sensitisation, individuality confusing, individuality premise, and committedness. During

the phases of homosexual individuality development, many homosexual striplings brush

many prepossessions and premises sing homosexualism. These premises

are given of heterosexualism, given of inversion, and acknowledgment of

stigma ( Herdt 4-5 ) . Using Troiden? s theoretical account as a usher, the present paper

examines the four phases of homosexual individuality development as it affects both

homosexual kids and parents. Section one concentrates on the first two phases of

homosexual individuality formation and the ordeals gay striplings and parents before

revelation. Section two explains the 3rd and 4th phases of homosexual

individuality development. Finally, subdivision three discusses parents? reactions to

the revelation, and the relationship with their kid thenceforth. The

Pre-Disclosure Period The first phase of homosexual individuality development,

sensitisation, occurs before pubescence. In the sensitisation phase, homosexual

striplings experience feelings of being? different? and fringy from same

gender equals ( Troiden 50 ) . Remarks such as the following illustrate what boys

feel during this phase: I had a keener involvement in the humanistic disciplines ; I ne’er learned to

battle ; I merely didn? t feel I was like other male childs. I was really affectionate of pretty

things like threads and flowers and music ; I was apathetic to boy? s games,

like bulls and robbers. I was more interested in watching insects and reflecting

on certain things. ( Durby 5 ) However, during this clip, kids do non

associate feelings as being homosexual or heterosexual ; these classs have no

significance to pre-teens ( Troiden 52 ) . Gay childs and their parents

encounter the given of heterosexualism. The heterosexual premise starts

during the sensitisation phase ; nevertheless, the effects can be longterm. The

given of straight persons is the belief that being heterosexual is superior,

? heterosexual ethnocentricity? Everyone is heterosexual ; to be

? different? is to be inferior ( Herdt 5 ) . American society has strict defined

male and female functions. Conformity is extremely valued. Traveling against conformance

particularly gender abnormalcy is viewed with derision and normally awarded with

shame and disdain ( Isay 30 ) . What is of import is the masculine/feminine

duality underscores heterosexual/homosexual duality. Parents force gender

conformance in simple kids and even pre-school kids when kids

show unconformist gender functions. Many parents fear that if their boy is

exposed to homosexualism or even the negative beliefs of homosexualism so

their kid might be recruited or seduced into the homosexual life style ( Taylor 41 ) .

The sensitisation phase can be a really hard clip for homosexual childs.

Childs who display unconformist gender behaviour are more likely to be

force per unit area by parents and equals to alter their behaviour ( Mallon, Helping 83 ) .

Feeling? different? and going self-alienated have been related to the

heterosexual premise. Among the most powerful causes are early homosexual and

sexual brushs and disinterest in many of several gender conformist kinds,

such as indifferent to the opposite sex or to athleticss. Homosexuals tend to hold their

foremost sexual contact at an earlier age than straight persons do, although no

grounds indicates prehomosexual male childs develop earlier than heterosexual male childs do.

Researchers argue that unusual neutrality in misss or athleticss reinforce the

societal disaffection of homosexuals, because squad athleticss and dating are cardinal constituents of

equal groupings ( Herdt 6 ) . One of the primary responses in feeling

? different? is the diminution of self-esteem because of the detrimental isolation.

Another response is to displace self-interest from athleticss and dating to

rational or artistic efforts. A 3rd response is to prosecute in secret same-sex

romantic dealingss ( 7 ) . Once the feeling of being? different? occurs,

another perceptual experience emerges, the given of inversion. In this perceptual experience,

homosexual persons have gender struggle because of their reversal of gender

behaviour. This struggle arises from the stereotype that if one is non

heterosexual so you must be unnatural: the? invert? ( Herdt 7 ) . Gay

striplings deficiency? homosexual cognition, ? that is, there is an absence of a existent

positive cognition of homosexualism individuality. The inversion premise is

deceit, which can do serious harm to gay teens? good being.

Feeling unnatural, cheery immature males think that they must expose features

of females in order to? suit in? , doing hyperfemininity in males ( 8 ) .

Identity confusion is the 2nd phase of homosexual individuality formation. Gay

males start to go cognizant that these feelings and behaviour might be connected

to homosexualism ( Troiden 52 ) . Gay adolescents experience interior confusion and

ambiguity. Their individuality is? stuck in the center? : they no longer see

themselves as straight persons, yet they have non yet viewed themselves as homosexual. The

early stage of individuality confusion is described as: You are non certain who you are.

You are confused about what kind of individual you are and where your life is traveling.

You ask yourself the inquiries? Who am I? , ? ? Am I a homosexual? , ? ? Am

I truly heterosexual? ? ( Cass 53 ) By center to late adolescence, homosexual teens

start to get down perceives themselves as homosexual. Many homosexual describe this stage

like the followers: You feel that you likely are homosexual, although you? re

non decidedly certain. You feel distant or cut off [ other people ] . You are

get downing think that it might assist to run into other homophiles but you? re non

certainly whether you truly want to or non. You prefer to set on a forepart of being

wholly heterosexual. ( Cass 53 ) Gay males respond to individuality confusion by

taking on one or more of the undermentioned tactics: ( a ) denial ; ( B ) fix ; ( degree Celsius )

turning away ; ( vitamin D ) redefinition ; and, ( vitamin E ) credence ( Troiden 56 ) . In denial, homosexual

striplings deny their homosexual feelings. Repair involves attempts to extinguish

homosexual emotions. Homosexual tend to maneuver off from homosexualism in

turning away ( 57 ) . The redefinition scheme is impermanent ; teens see their

homosexual feeling as a stage that will go through. The concluding scheme is acceptance ;

adolescents recognize that they might be homophiles and hunt for information

about their sexual feelings ( 58 ) The acknowledgment of stigma faces homosexual teens

around the clip of the 2nd phase of homosexual individuality development ( Herdt

10 ) . Populating in a homophobic society hinders many striplings from following

their homosexual individuality ( 5 ) . The ground why homosexual teens feel disgusted and

shamed about being homosexual is society? s prejudice and stereotyped position on

homophiles. Some cheery males report the first word they associate their sexual

feelings with is non homosexual, but? cocksucker? ( Troiden 58 ) . The five

tactics of covering with individuality confusion are truly stigma-management

schemes. All one has to make is turn the telecasting to Jerry Springer and see

the stereotyped super-effeminate homosexual parading on the phase ; watch a

film about with

homosexual, but covering with homophiles with AIDS ; or, hear

heated arguments on the moral perversion of homophiles from Television Christian

revivalist. Gay striplings have no positive homosexual function theoretical accounts. They are loath

to see themselves homosexual because that might intend being

? super-effeminate-stricken-with-AIDS-doomed-to-hell faggot. ? Gay striplings

are non the lone 1s to detect that they might be homosexual ; their parents are

merely as perceptive. Many cheery young persons suggest that their female parents seem to be cognizant

of their individuality confusion ( Mallon, Wagon 40 ) . One female parent recollects on

knowing: I noticed Joshua was different? ? He? s artistic, ? I told

myself, uneasy with the other word that was running through my caput:

? effeminate? ? Like many parents, I fell prey to frights that my boy? s

difference meant he would turn up to be one of them, a homosexual. ( Mallon,

Wagon 40 ) Gay work forces describe their male parents as distant during childhood ; they

lacked any bond to them ( Isay 32 ) . A male parent may go unreceptive or detached

when feeling his boy may be homosexual. The male parent? s remotion may be the ground

why homosexual immature males have hapless self-esteem. The Disclosure Period The 3rd phase

of Troiden? s theoretical account is identity premise. ? In this phase, the homosexual

individuality becomes both a self-identity and a presented individuality, at least to

other homophiles? ( Troiden 59 ) . Self-recognition and revelation to others of

their sexual penchant first occurs here ; marks of coming out. Along with

self-recognition and revelation, the features of this developmental phase

are: better self-acceptance of being homosexual, sexual activities, engagement

in homosexual subcultures, geographic expedition of different types of friendly relationships and other

relationships. While there is self-identification and better self-acceptance,

full credence of being homosexual does non happen ; it is tolerated ( 60 ) . Calcium

describes people at this phase as follows: You feel certain you? re a homosexual

and you put up with, or digest this. You see yourself as a homosexual for now

but are non certain about how you will be in the hereafter. You normally take attention to

put across a heterosexual image. You sometimes blend socially with homophiles, or

would wish to make this. You feel a demand to run into others like yourself. ( 156 )

Contact with other homophiles is important at this phase. Negative initial

contact with other homophiles can be black, ensuing the novitiate

homosexual to return to the experiences of phase two. However, positive initial

contact with other homophiles furthers the development and ripening of the

novice homosexual. Positive contact helps cut down the feelings of being alienated

or unnatural ( Troiden 61 ) . The concluding phase in development of a homosexual

individuality in Troiden? s theoretical account is that of committedness. In the committedness phase,

homophiles adopt homosexualism as a life style and feel comfy. The homosexual

young person enjoys satisfaction of being homosexual ( Troiden 63 ) . Within committedness are two

elements, internal and external. In the internal dimension, gender and

emotionalism integrate, positive change in the conceptualisation of homosexual

individuality occurs, and an addition of satisfaction and felicity emerges ( 64 ) . The

external features are the effects of the internal dimension. Same-sex

romantic relationships start, showing the integrating of emotionalism and

gender. The positive displacement of the conceptualisation of cheery individuality makes

revelation easier ( 65 ) . Calcium expresses this phase a positive and unfastened phase: You

are prepared to state [ about ] anyone that you are s homosexual. You are happy

about the manner you are but feel that being homosexual is non the most of import

portion of you. You mix socially with homophiles and straight persons [ with whom ] you

are unfastened about your homosexualism. ( 156 ) The Post Disclosure Period Some parents

adjust efficaciously to their kid? s homosexualism ; nevertheless, other parents are

unsuspicious and responding unpredictably, negative mode ( Mallon, Wagon 36 ) . The

ground for such negative parental reaction to their kid? s revelation is the

first thing most parents do is use their negative and frequently misidentify

construct of homosexualism to their ain kid ( 42 ) . Populating in a homophobic

society can make household jobs, because a homophobic society triggers

negative reactions ( 36 ) . Parents try and cover with? with guilt, choler,

concerns for a kid? s felicity in the old ages to come, spiritual issues, and

any of the myriad of myths that are portion of the parent? s ain homophobic

socialisation? ( Hidalgo 21 ) . The get downing reactions of parents to a kid? s

coming out relate to gay striplings? experiences in the 2nd phase of

homosexualism individuality development, individuality confusion. Parents go through

phases of: ( 1 ) denial ; ( 2 ) turning away ; ( 3 ) fix ; ( 4 ) guilt ; and, ( 5 ) rejection

( 1 42 ) . Many parents invariably tell their kid, ? It? s merely a phase. ? The

denial phase for parents is the redefinition period that cheery striplings undergo

in individuality confusion. Many parents tend to avoid the topic all together ;

parents want to speak about anything but it. However, homophiles feel that they

can non pass on with their parents ( Mallon, Wagon 44 ) . Most parents send

their homosexual kid to therapy in hopes for a? cure. ? ( 45 ) . The impression of seeking

to bring around their kid is? a contemplation of their wants than on his demands?

( Hidalgo 24-25 ) . Besides, most attempts of a? remedy? fail ( Mallon, Wagon 45 ) .

Parents have been given incorrect information about their function mold, behaviour,

and rearing manner that determined their kid? s sexual orientation.

Therefore, parents react negatively ; they feel guilty ( Mallon, Helping 83 ) . They

start to believe they were parents, inquiring themselves, ? What did I make

incorrect? ? ( Mallon, Wagon 49 ) . Parents should recognize that there is no grounds

that parents are responsible for their kid? s sexual orientation ( Hidalgo

24 ) . In many instances, the parents reject their kid. Many homophiles recount

experiencing like this when their parents rejected them: When I realized that my ain

household couldn? T accept me, my ain flesh and blood, I thought, why should I

anticipate the remainder of society to cut me any slack? I felt hopeless, disillusioned

and worthless. My ain household? how could they make this to me, be so cold, so

uncaring. It was as if they were stating they didn? T attention if I died. I don? T

think I? ll of all time acquire over that. ( Mallon, Helping 84 ) . Rejection can be really

brutal. Parents become emotional, verbal, and physical abusive to their kid.

The maltreatment can be so terrible that juvenile tribunal must step in ( Abinati 161 ) . Bing

kicked out from the place is another effect of rejection by parents ( Mallon,

Wagon 83 ) . Urban and rural Associate research workers discovered that many immature male

cocottes are homosexual, and they are merchandises of their households? inability

to accept their boy? s homosexualism ( Coleman 136 ) . It would be incorrect to state

that merely negative results occur when a kid tells his parents he is cheery. Many

kids feel that in order to set up an honest relationship with their

parents so they must? come clean? to them. Ben-Ari? s research points out

those striplings who want to be unfastened and honest with their parents receive that

after revelation. Parents are normally accepting after clip their kid? s

sexual penchant ( 107 ) Decision This paper has attempt to by and large demo

young persons turning up homosexual. A figure of issues have been presented affecting homosexual

individuality formation, parental interaction, and revelation. Homosexuality is a

really controversial topic. By no mean does this paper attempt to state that it is

? wholly correct. ? However, the paper does analyze logical theoretical thoughts

of what homosexual striplings endure, utilizing and uniting research and studies of

other homosexual surveies.

Abinati, Abby. ? Legal Challenges Confronting Lesbian and GayYouths. ? Helping

Gay and Lesbian Youth. Ed. DeCrescenzo, Teresa. New York: Haworth Press, Inc. ,

1994. Ben-Ari, Adital. ? Disclosure to Parents? Journal of Homosexuality. 30

( 1995 ) : 89-111. Cass, V.C. ? Homosexual Identity? Journal of Homosexuality 9

( 1983/1984 ) : 105-126. Coleman, Eli. ? The Development of male Prostitution

Activity Among Gay and Bisexual Adolescents. ? Gay and Lesbian Youth. Ed. Herdt,

Gilbert. New York: Harrington Park Press, 1989. Durby, Dennis D. ? Gay,

Lesbian, and Bisexual Youth. ? Helping Gay and Lesbian Youth. Ed. DeCrescenzo,

Teresa. New York: Haworth Press, Inc. , 1994. Herdt, Gilbert. ? Introduction:

Gay and Lesbian Youth, Emergent Identities, and Cultural Scenes at Home and

Abroad. ? Gay and Lesbian Youth. Ed. Herdt, Gilbert. New York: Harrington Park

Imperativeness, 1989. Hidalgo, Hilda. Lesbian and Gay Issues. Maryland: National

Association of Social Workers, 1985. Isay, Richard A. Bing Homosexual. New

Jersey: Jason Aronson, Inc. , 1989. Mallon, Gerald P. ? Counseling Strategies

with Gay and Lesbian Youth. ? Helping Gay and Lesbian Youth. Ed. DeCrescenzo,

Teresa. New York: Haworth Press, Inc. , 1994. Mallon, Gerald P. We Don? T

Precisely Get the Welcome Wagon. New York: Columbia University Press, 1998.

Taylor, Nancy. ? Gay and Lesbian Young person: Challenging the Policy of Denial. ?

Helping Gay and Lesbian Youth. Ed. DeCrescenzo, Teresa. New York: Haworth Press,

Inc. , 1994. Troiden, Richard R. ? The Formation of Homosexual Identities. ?

Gay and Lesbian Youth. Ed. Herdt, Gilbert. New York: Harrington Park Press,

1989. Walling, Donovan R. Gay Teens at Risk. Indiana: Phi Delta Kappa

Educational Foundation, 1993.