Political Theory and the Budget

/in /by

[ad_1]

Political Theory and the Budget
Required Resources
Read/review the following resources for this activity:
• Textbook: Review Chapter 2, 3 (pp. 56-59), 13 (Understanding Politics: Ideas and Institutions by Thomas Magstadt, 2017 version)
• Additional scholarly sources you identify through your own research (two others added to the textbook)
Initial Post Instructions:
It is a discussion post not an essay but still has to follow APA format for a discussion post.
Explain how a liberal and conservative would approach developing the US budget. Use evidence (cite sources) to support your response from assigned readings or online lessons, and at least one outside scholarly source.
Rubric:
Follow just the part for the Initial post

Discussion Grading Rubric – 25 pts
Discussion Grading Rubric – 25 pts
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Initial Post Content 7.0 pts
Addresses all aspects of the initial discussion question(s), applying experiences, knowledge, and understanding regarding all weekly concepts. 5.0 pts
Addresses most aspects of the initial discussion question(s), applying experiences, knowledge, and understanding of most of the weekly concepts. 3.0 pts
Addresses some aspects of the initial discussion question(s), applying experiences, knowledge, and understanding of some of the weekly concepts. 0.0 pts
Minimally addresses the initial discussion question(s) or does not address the initial question(s).
7.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Initial Post Evidence & Sources 4.0 pts
Integrates evidence to support discussion from assigned readings OR online lessons, AND at least one outside scholarly source. Sources are credited. 3.0 pts
Integrates evidence to support discussion from assigned readings OR online lessons. Sources are credited. 2.0 pts
Integrates evidence to support discussion only from an outside source with no mention of assigned reading or lesson. Sources are credited. 0.0 pts
Does not integrate any evidence.
4.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Follow-Up Post 1 4.0 pts
Response furthers the dialogue by providing more information and clarification, thereby adding much depth to the discussion. 3.0 pts
Response furthers the dialogue by adding some depth to the discussion. 2.0 pts
Response does not further the dialogue significantly; adds little depth to the discussion. 0.0 pts
Does not respond to another student or instructor.
4.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeFollow-Up Post 2 4.0 pts
Response furthers the dialogue by providing more information and clarification, thereby adding much depth to the discussion. 3.0 pts
Response furthers the dialogue by adding some depth to the discussion. 2.0 pts
Response does not further the dialogue significantly; adds little depth to the discussion. 0.0 pts
Does not respond to another student or instructor.
4.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeProfessional Communication 4.0 pts
Presents information using clear and concise language in an organized manner (minimal errors in English grammar, spelling, syntax, and punctuation). 3.0 pts
Presents information in an organized manner (few errors in English grammar, spelling, syntax, and punctuation). 2.0 pts
Presents information using understandable language but is somewhat disorganized (some errors in English grammar, spelling, syntax, and punctuation). 0.0 pts
Presents information that is not clear, logical, professional or organized to the point that the reader has difficulty understanding the message (numerous errors in English grammar, spelling, syntax, and/or punctuation).
4.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeTimeliness of Responses 1.0 pts
Student posts an answer to the initial discussion question(s) by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. M.T. 0.0 pts
Student does not post an answer to the initial discussion question(s) by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. M.T.
1.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeFrequency of Responses 1.0 pts
Posts in the discussion on two different days. 0.0 pts
Posts fewer than two different days OR does not participate at all.
1.0 pts
Total Points: 25.0

Sample answer

Political theory and the Budget
In the context of their ideologies differences, liberals and conservations are likely to adopt a different position about budgetary issues in the US. Notably, the areas where the two groups disagree include economic stability sources for the country and the adoption of rules or otherwise in the formulation of economic policies (Magstadt, 2017). Moreover, the choice of monetary or fiscal policy in the process of achieving stability in the economy and the potential issues which may lead to inflation form other factors for dispute (Hines, 2012). This discussion focuses on key areas of budgeting to draw a correlation in differences in perspectives between the two sides of the divide.
On sources of instability in the economic situation of the country, conservatives are likely to advocate for a free market economy in which the flow of good and service is unrestricted by the government. Under this initiative, any intervention measure by the government paper help to control trade is a major threat to the stability of the economy (Magstadt, 2017). On the other end, liberals prefer an economic system where restrictions are imposed in the market to prevent any extreme measures which could cause harm to the economy (Magstadt, 2017). Also, conservatives perceive interventions by the government such as facilitation of programs of home ownership and more restrictions on policies which influence budgeting as threats to the economy.
Additionally, this point justifies the current complaints among conservatives as they attempt to fault the government for the financial crisis because of its housing initiatives. On their part, liberals consider the free market and privatization of major business channels as the main threat to economic stability hence the need for budgeting stakeholders to address the gaps while formulating the budget (Magstadt, 2017). Therefore, conservatives and liberals differ fundamentally on the economic perspectives which affect the budgeting process in the US as demonstrated under this discussion.

References
Hines, E. E. (2012). A conservative’s treatise on American government: A brief discussion of what a government, subordinate to the sovereign people, must do. Bloomington, IN: Xlibris Corporation.
Magstadt, T. M. (2017). Understanding Politics: Ideas, institutions, and issues. Boston, MA Cengage Learning.

The post Political Theory and the Budget appeared first on mynursinghomeworks.

[ad_2]

Source link