HA2022 Business Law, Written Report and Presentation
[ad_1]
HA2022 Business Law Group Assignment
Assessment Details and Submission Guidelines
Trimester T2 2019
Unit Code HA2022
Unit Title Business Law
Assessment Type Group assignment
Assessment Title Written Report and Presentation
Purpose of the
assessment (with ULO
Mapping)
Studentsarerequiredto resolve two case problemtypequestions from a listof case
problem questions provided from the prescribed textbook using IRAC method, based
on topics discussed in lectures.
Case problem type questions include:
Contract Law
The Law of Torts and Negligence
Applications of Negligence to Business
Weight 20% of the total assessments
Total Marks 20 marks: 10 marks for Written report and 10 marks for presentation
Word limit Not more than 2000 words
Due Date Friday Week 10 – 11.59pm
Submission
Guidelines
AllworkmustbesubmittedonBlackboardbytheduedatealongwithacompleted
Assignment CoverPage.
TheassignmentmustbeinMSWordformat,nospacing,12-ptArialfontand2cm
margins on all four sides of your page with appropriate section headings and page
numbers.
Referencesourcesmustbecitedinthetextofthereport,andlistedappropriately
at the end in a reference list using Harvard referencing style.
HOLMES INSTITUTE
FACULTY OF
HIGHER EDUCATION
Page 2 of 8
HA2022 Business Law Group Assignment
Assignment 1Specifications
Purpose:
This assignment aims at ensuring that students have familiarised themselves with their chosen case problem
type questions and are able to apply the legal knowledge to factual situations, through written and/or oral
communication, to achieve a reasoned conclusion. The ability to identify the relevant legal issues from a
factual situation and the application of statute and case law involves the use of problem solving and decision
making skills.
Details:
Topics andpresentation schedule:
Please organise yourselves into groups of not more than 5 students and not less than 3 students.
The assignment consists of 2 parts:
1. Written report – worth 10% and must be submitted – Friday Week 10 at 11.59pm.
This group assignment consists of 2 parts. Part Ais a case study on Contract law, and Part Bis a
questioninvolvingCivilLiability(theLawofTortsandNegligence).Bothquestionsmustbe
answered.
Thetotalwordlimitforthegroupreportis2,000words.Eachparthasamaximumwordcountof
1,000 words.
Thetotalwordcountforthereportaswellaseachpartmustbeclearlywrittenonthecover sheetof
theassignment.Yourassignmentwill notbemarkedifthewordcountsarenotwrittenonthecover
sheet.
PART A: Contract Law Questions
1. Refertotheprescribedtextbook:Gibson,A,BusinessLaw,10th edition(Pearson,Sydney:2017).
2. From Part 3 –Law of Contracts, Chapters 7 to 15 on Contract Law, refer to the “Tutorial Questions”
attheendofthechaptersand chooseone(1)problemcasequestion.Note:itmustbea case
problem-type question and not a short answer question.
3. Youmustsendyourlecturerthenumberofyourquestionandthepageonwhichisappearsfor
approval.Donot start work onaquestionwithoutobtainingyourlecturer’spriorapproval.
4. In notmore than1,000words, answer your chosen legal casequestion using theIRACmethod.
5. Your answer must be supported by relevant law and cases decided by Australian courts (preferably
theHighCourt)and/orscholarlyarticles.Aminimumof 3 referencesarerequiredforthispartof
the report.
6. Your references must be listed in a Reference list at the end of the Part A question.
Page 3 of 8
HA2022 Business Law Group Assignment
PART B: The Law of Torts and Negligence Questions
1. Refertotheprescribedtextbook:Gibson,A,BusinessLaw,10th edition(Pearson,Sydney:2017).
2. Referto Part 2 – Civil Liability; Chapter 4 (Civil Liability: The Law of Torts and Negligence) and
Chapter 5 (Applications of Negligence to Business).
3. Refertothe“TutorialQuestions”attheendofthechaptersandchooseone(1)problemcase
question.Note:itmustbeacaseproblem-typequestionandnotashortanswerquestion.
4. Youmustsendyourlecturerthenumberofyourquestionandthepageonwhichitappearsfor
approval.Doesnotstartworkonaquestionwithoutobtainingyourlecturer’spriorapproval.
5. In notmore than1,000words, answer your chosen legal casequestionusing theIRACmethod.
6. Your answer must be supported by relevant law and cases decided by Australian courts (preferably
theHighCourt)and/orscholarlyarticles.Aminimumof3referencesarerequiredforthispartofthe
report.
7. Your references must be listed in a Reference list at the end of the Part B question.
Assignment structure is to be written as a report format. It must include;
Cover page
Executive summary
Table of contents
Section headings
Paragraphing
Page numbers
Reference list at the end of the report
2. GroupPresentation–worth 10%andwillbe presented/ submittedonFridayWeek 10 at11.59pm.
Strict adherence to the 10 minute limit is expected.
Present and discuss the summary of your report (part A and B) in 10 minutes.
ThePresentationwillbedoneinclassorvideorecording.Yourlecturerwilladvisewhichismore
appropriate. Whether in-class or video presentation, all members must present. The group will be
marked down if not all members present.
Video link must be uploaded to a publicly-viewable video sharing platform (ex. Youtube, Dropbox,
Google drive) and the video link uploaded on Blackboard.
Avideo presentationconsistsofbothimagesandaudio.Forthis reason,aplainPowerPoint
presentation showing slides even with accompanying voice recording is not considered a video and,
hence, not allowed.
Important Reminders:
Lecturer approval of chosen case:
1. You must email your lecturer your list of group members and chosen case by week 4.
2. You must obtain approval by email from your lecturer of your group and chosen case before starting
workonit.YoumustNOTstartworkonyourgroupassignmentuntilyourlecturerapprovesyour
Page 4 of 8
HA2022 Business Law Group Assignment
groupandcase.Pleasenote:failuretoobtainlecturerapprovalwillresultinafailingmarkfor
the entire group for this assignment.
Submission:
1. All group report submissions must be done online and run through SafeAssign. No hard copies are to
be submitted. Only one group member needs to submit for the whole group.
2. Please fill in the “Rubric Group Report” sheet (available in Blackboard under“Assignments and Due
dates) and attach as a cover sheet to your group report and upload onBlackboard.
3. Each group must email a ‘’Peer Evaluation of Individual Participation in Group Assignment” sheet to
their lecturer (available in Blackboard under “Assignments and Due dates).
4. Non-submissionofeitherthegroupreportorvideopresentationlink(ifagroupisdoingavideo)on
Blackboard/SafeAssign (if doing a video presentation) is equivalent to non-submission, which will
merit a mark of 0 (zero) for the group assignment.
5. Thisisagroupassignmentandismeanttobeworkedoningroups.Groupsoflessthan3andmore5
members will receive a penalty of 10 marks (50%).
6. Reports must be submitted via SafeAssign onBlackboard and show a similarity percentage figure.
Any group report that does not show a SafeAssign similarity percentage will not be marked and be
required to re-submit.
7. Late submissions will be subject to Holmes Institute policy on student assessment submission and
late penalties (please refer to subject outline and Student handbook).
8. Assignments are expected to observe proper referencing in accordance with a generally accepted
system of citation (ex, Harvard System). Aproperly referenced assignment showing in-text citation is
critical to passing and obtaining a good mark in the group assignment.
SafeAssign similarity percentage:
1. Plagiarism in any form, shape or manneris unacceptable under any circumstances and will be dealt
with according to Institute policy on plagiarism.
2. In general, for written reports, a SafeAssign similarity percentage of 25% or below is acceptable.
Regardless of the similarity figure, all group reports must use in-text citation and observe proper
referencing rules.
Marking criteria Weighting (%)
Group Report
– Identification of material facts involved in problem question 2%
– Identification of legal issues / legal question and relevant law 2%
– Thorough yet succinct application of law to material facts 3%
– Citation and referencing 1.5%
– Professional quality 1.5%
Presentation
– Group member participation and division of parts 1.5%
– Depth of analysis and evidence of understanding of the issues presented
and critical thinking in answers
4%
– Level of professionalism in presentation 3%
– Overall clarity of presentation 1.5%
TOTAL Weight 20%
Page 5 of 8
HA2022 Business Law Group Assignment
Marking Rubric
Group Report
Total marks
available: 10 marks
Excellent Good Satisfactory Unsatisfactory
Identification of
material facts
involved in problem
question
2 marks
1.75 to 2 marks
Completely
identifies all
relevant facts of
case
1.25 to 1.5 mark
Identifies most of
the relevant facts
of case
0.8 to 1 mark
Identifies the
basic relevant
facts of the case
but misses other
relevant facts
0 to 0.75 mark
Does not identify
relevant facts of case
Identification of
legal issues / legal
question and
relevant law
2 marks
1.75 to 2 marks
Correctly identifies
all relevant legal
issues and are
stated in the form
of questions.
Correctly identifies
relevant and
appropriate legal
rules and case law,
and states them in
the form of
statements
1.25 to 1.5 marks
Issues correctly
identified, but
may contain
extraneous
information and
are not stated in
the form of
questions.
Legal rules and
case law correctly
identified, but
may contain
extraneous info
and are not in the
form of
statements.
0.8 to 1 mark
Issues are not
completely
identified.
Legal rules and
case law not
correctly
identified.
0 to 0.75 mark
Identifies incorrect or
irrelevant issues.
Identifies incorrect or
irrelevant legal rules
and case law.
Thorough yet
succinct application
of law to material
facts
3 marks
2.75 to 3 marks
Correctly identifies
facts; wellreasoned
discussion relating
facts to the rules
and case law.
2 to 2.5 marks
Correctly
identifies facts.
Not well
reasoned.
1.5 to 1.75 marks
Facts not correctly
identified.
Analysis
incoherent.
0 to 1.25 marks
No analysis.
Citation and
referencing
(including minimum
number of
references)
1.5 marks
1.05 to 1.5 marks
Correctly cites
minimum of 6
references, in-text
and in reference
list.
0.8 to 1 mark
Has minimum of 6
references; or has
occasional errors
in formatting of
in-text citations
and reference list
0.6 to 0.75 mark
Does not have
minimum of 6
references or
contains errors in
formatting of intext citations and
reference list
0 to 0.5 mark
No referencing either
in-text or in reference
list; or cites
inappropriate
references; or all
references not cited in
the correct format.
Page 6 of 8
HA2022 Business Law Group Assignment
Professional quality
including language
use and writing
style
1.5 marks
1.05 to 1.5 marks
Professional
language. No
grammatical,
punctuation or
spelling errors.
0.8 to 1 mark
Some mistakes.
Does not detract
from
understanding.
0.6 to 0.75 mark
Many mistakes.
Detracts from
understanding.
Sloppy.
0 to 0.5 mark
Reflects no real effort.
Deductions
Excess word count
(1 mark for every 25
words over)
Under the word limit
(1 mark for every 25
word under)
Lacks minimum of 6
references (1 mark
for every missing
reference)
Page 7 of 8
HA2022 Business Law Group Assignment
Group Presentation
Total marks
available: 10
Excellent Good Satisfactory Unsatisfactory
Group member
participation and
division of parts
1.5 marks
1.05 to 1.5 marks
All group members
presented and
presentation is
equally divided
among group
members;
presentation shows
an excellent level of
effort
0.8 to 1 mark
All group
members
presented but
presentation is
not equally
divided among
group members;
presentation
shows a high level
of effort
0.6 to 0.75 mark
Not all group
members
presented or
presentation is
not equally
divided among
group members;
but presentation
shows average
effort.
0 to 0.5 mark
Not all group members
presented and
presentation does not
show real effort.
Depth of analysis
and evidence of
understanding of
the issues
presented and
critical thinking in
answers
4 marks
3.75 to 4 marks
Displays in-depth
analysis and
evidence of strong
understanding of
the issues
presented and
critical thinking in
answers.
3 to 3.5 marks
Displays strong
analysis and
understanding of
the issues
presented and
critical thinking in
answers.
2 to 2.75 marks
Shows acceptable
level of analysis
and
understanding of
the issues.
0 to 1.75 marks
Does not show
acceptable level of
analysis and
understanding of the
issues; merely reads
from prepared
answers.
Level of
professionalism in
presentation
(including members
in appropriate
business attire; and
use of visual aids)
3 marks
2.75 to 3 marks
High-level of
professionalism in
presentation
2 to 2.5 marks
Above average
level of
professionalism in
presentation
1.5 to 1.75 marks
Average level of
professionalism in
presentation
0 to 1.25 marks
Below average level of
professionalism in
presentation
Overall clarity of
presentation
1.5 marks
1.05 to 1.5 marks
Extremely clear,
succinct
presentation
0.8 to 1 mark
High level of
clarity and
succinctness of
presentation
0.6 to 0.75 mark
Average level of
clarity and
succinctness of
presentation
0 to 0.5 mark
Below average level of
clarity and succinctness
of presentation
The post HA2022 Business Law, Written Report and Presentation appeared first on mynursinghomeworks.
[ad_2]
Source link
