Black Boy By Richard Wright 2 Essay

, Research Paper

Frederick Douglass and Richard Wright wrote memoirs telling their experiences with racism. Though their authorship manners are wholly different from one another, the topics they discuss are similar. After reading each piece they have both made me sympathize with their feelings, nevertheless different their lives are from mine. Their memoirs, My Bondage My Freedom and Black Boy, provide insightful images of the racialist and cruel intervention these authors experienced. Despite all of their stylistic differences, after both extracts I understand the passion they felt for the hate they endured.

The fluctuation of the authors use of citation Markss provides penetration to the grade of formality that Wright and Douglass express. Wright utilizations citations often and entirely in duologue. Included within the quotation marks are the unfair petitions, unjust intelligence, and degrading comments that infuriated him.

Hello, Ned. What s new? I asked.

You ve heard, haven t you? he asked.

About what?

My brother, Bob?

No, what happened?

Ned began to cry quietly.

They killed him, he managed to state.

The white folks? I asked in a susurration, thinking.

He sobbed his reply. Bob was dead ; I had met him merely a few times, but I felt that I had known him through his brother ( p. 382 ) .

I feel as though I can hear the words merely as he did. Richard Wright s usage of citations is effectual in making an informal tone and showing his feelings of impotence. It is a really effectual tool for an empathic reaction from the reader.

Douglass usage of citation Markss is rather opposite from Wright s. Screaming and vocal are merely in quotation marks to put accent on the importance of the information he includes. Let my mammy go & # 8211 ; allow my mammy travel, a kid shriek ( p. 143 ) . His economical usage of quotation marks makes each outburst highly powerful and passionate. This cry of panic makes it easy to experience the urgency Douglass felt.

Their usage of I besides attributes to the greater apprehension of their cruel experiences. Frederick Douglass seldom refers to himself with I. He does, nevertheless, reference incidents that had a direct consequence on him.

Although my old master- Capt. Anthony- gave me at first, ( as the reader will hold already seen, ) really fifty-one

ttle attending, and although that small was unusually mild and soft description, a few months merely were sufficient to convert me that clemency and gradualness were non the prevailing or regulating traits of his character ( p.135 ) .

This portion of his manner leaves me understanding his experiences in the most factual manner possible.

Richard Wright uses I often, and invariably persuades me of his sentiment of his experiences. I am positive that he was wronged though in a less factual manner.

I had one more job to settle before I could do my address. I was the lone male child in my category have oning short bloomerss and I was grimly determined to go forth school in long bloomerss. Was I non traveling to work? Would I non be on my ain? ( p. 387 ) .

With more personal mention it is easier to place with Wright.

The function of circumstance is of import in comparing and contrasting Wright and Douglass. Wright chooses to take duty for everything, while Douglass is more inactive in taking ownership in his actions. Wright does non allow fortunes command him ; alternatively he decides to command the state of affairs.

Douglass, nevertheless, is rather the antonym. He chooses to be the victim of his environing fortunes. Everything determines what will go on to him. Douglass describes One of the first fortunes that opened my eyes to the inhuman treatment and evil of bondage, and the coldheartedness of my old maestro, was the refusal of the latter to interpose his authorization, to protect and screen a immature adult female, who had been most cruelly abused and beaten by his superintendent in Tuckahoe ( p. 137 ) . Douglass truly makes me experience how I would if those fortunes were impacting me.

The length of the sentences and paragraphs reflects the formality of their voices every bit good. Douglass writes drawn-out paragraphs and has a varied sentence length throughout. Wright has both short sentences and paragraphs.

Throughout the pieces, Wright is much more personal and informal while Douglass strives and succeeds in composing a more factual history of his experiences. Both are successful in their look of the unkindness they endured, their picks of look were merely different.

I left each piece experiencing the abrasiveness and seeing the vivid images both authors portrayed through different manners and techniques.

342