Analysis Against Work

Also, Clauses has the clear and narrow theses In different parts of his essay. Lastly, Clauses has well explained examples and clear language to support his theses. Although Clauses does not show what his opinions about “against work” are, readers are able to identify the introduction, body and the conclusion in the text. In the beginning, Clauses gains readers’ attention by telling him/her that he used to have different dreams in his youth. At this time, he never intended to work at all. Following the Introduction, he addresses a question “what Is the use of having money If you have to work for it? (Casualness).

This urges readers to think about the real reason hat people work is It only because of money? Then, he considers that It is the American way that defines yourself valuable by working long hours despite what you accomplish. (Clause 21) In the first two pages, Clauses does not clearly give his own definition of Against work; either does he menu whether or not he Is supposing this idea.

Nevertheless, toward the end of the essay, readers can find there are many examples of other’s Ideas as well as author’s own experiences that combine both working and pleasure.By reading again and again, readers can realize that Clauses sakes an argument of not working. When It comes to conclusion, it Is quite clear of Clause’s idea because he is straight forward to think about early retirement which is deferent from what most people have expected. (Clauses 1 26) The theses statements in Against Work are clear-narrowed and well-argued. Clauses starts from discuss the hypothesis that American might be the only creatures that don’t know how to enjoy their life (Clauses 120-1).

Then, he compares how Europeans and Americans see their work and their life (Clauses 120). To be more specific, Clauses argues that it IsAmerican tradition that results In people define themselves by the amount of labor they put in rather than Just seeing their occupations (Clauses 121 ). Additionally, Clauses notes that people In general are uninteresting In their work and their Job status are comparable in terms of level of happiness and life satisfaction. In order to be more succinct enough to make a good argument, Clauses reports David Watson. A psychologist’s work. He quotes, “Although having some goals in life seems to work better than having none,” happiness Is primary s subjective phenomenon..

. To highly constrained by objective circumstance. I believe this is a really good writing with such a strong supporting Idea. Besides, he also mentions the opposite side; Carryall’s idea who believes working has nothing to do with happiness. (Clauses 125) These ideas Clauses used are related to each other which give readers a better understanding. Using the clear language and well evidence, Clauses makes a sufficient explanation to support his argument. He identifies the reason why people work because they find relief from loneliness by doing even Jobs such working in an assembly line, other people such as doctors or lawyers who define themselves as sense of committed of their Jobs.

Clause 22). Clauses also uses his experience of working for government in the basement during summer. This no busy Job bought him the idea that somehow he would rather not working. (Casualness) Moreover, he figures out that American are unconsciously following the traditional idea that they are working out of moral vanity in order to do their best. Also, he notes that work can achieve different accomplishments especially virtuous. (Clauses 124) Having these examples, readers are able to understand what Clauses is trying to tell his readers.